Update to the "law" of hype evolution

From Martin's and David's posts I take it that I should update my "law" of hype evolution presented here. (Well, I should have understood this after having spoken to Steve Vinoski at JAOO last year, but I'm a bit slow off the mark.)

I need to add “understanding”. After "hangover" comes "understanding" or at least willingness to understand... Then "positioning". Like this:
  • Hype
  • Hangover
  • Understanding
  • Positioning
BTW, I currently prefer to think about SO* in the way David calls "Services as Integration Gateways", but I can't say I know or have thought too much about the whole thing...